In this episode, Jason Hartman shares his thoughts on an article from Zerohedge regarding the U.S. homeownership rate. He also talks about the median asking rate across the U.S. and the free market technology. Then, he welcomes the CEO and Founder of Pro.com, Matt Williams. Matt shares his work experience and talks briefly about Digg’s V4. He also explains the service they provide at Pro.com and discusses how real estate agents work with them. 

Announcer 0:00
This show is produced by the Hartman media company. For more information and links to all our great podcasts, visit Hartman media.com.

Announcer 0:13
Welcome to the creating wealth show with Jason Hartman. You’re about to learn a new slant on investing some exciting techniques and fresh new approaches to the world’s most historically proven asset class that will enable you to create more wealth and freedom than you ever thought possible. Jason is a genuine self made multi millionaire who’s actually been there and done it. He’s a successful investor, lender, developer and entrepreneur who’s owned properties in 11 states had hundreds of tenants and been involved in 1000s of real estate transactions. This program will help you follow in Jason’s footsteps on the road to your financial independence day. You really can do it. And now here’s your host, Jason Hartman with the complete solution for real estate investors.

Jason Hartman 1:03
Welcome to the creating wealth show. This is episode number 572. This is your host, Jason Hartman, thank you so much for joining me today. By the way, we’ve got some great episodes coming up we always do. Our flashback Friday episode will be with Dr. Steve sugar rude of Stansbury research and a Gora financial. So check him out, I think you’ll really enjoy that episode. And as we talked about what was going to happen to the real estate market a few years ago, and that prediction was pretty darn accurate. Again, again, another good prediction. And then Monday we’ve got Darren Bloomquist realty tracks, housing news report, some really good data there, understanding closing costs, and good faith estimates next week, on Wednesday, so you’ll get some good insight into that with one of our lenders, we just got a bunch of other great shows coming up. So just stay tuned. Really good stuff there for you. So before we dive into this one, I want to first tell you that I may sound just a tad giddy, just a tad giddy, just a tad excited when I’m interviewing this guest. And I want to give you my motivation. It’s not money, well, at least not directly. It is that I am just excited about the idea that people are becoming more and more empowered. In fact, one of my goals that I have done absolutely nothing to bother to pursue, like so many other goals I have is to do a TED talk. And I want to do a TED talk on this, this idea of individual empowerment of how power is going down to the person with all of the great technologies we have nowadays. And the advantages of that, and I’m not going to tell you the title I’m thinking of for my TED Talk, because I don’t want to just broadcast that.

But anyway, I do sound a little giddy because this interview today with a former CEO of digg.com. Of course, that’s di g g.com. Matt Williams, he’s going to talk about his new company called pro.com, which allows people to really take the mystery out of repairs and rehabs and improvements to their properties. And I just want to tell you, I may sound a little excited when I’m interviewing this guest, but I have no affiliation with them. I’ve never even really heard of the company before the interview was booked. I mean, I didn’t hear of it. Before that. I did hear of it a little bit before I interviewed him as I was looking at my upcoming interviews scheduled. I just think this is yet another of the many examples of the way the information is being taken out of the hands of that third party of that property manager. And it is being put into the hands of the investor where the investor can easily access this information. The only areas where big money is cloaked in mystery, and the empowerment doesn’t get to the individual is of course government, Wall Street, the banking system, and including the federal reserve of course in the Wall Street banking system cartel and also the deals where people are investing in syndications and in LLCs, and not following commandment number three, thou shalt maintain control by being a direct investor. These are the areas where information is cloaked, where it is hidden, where the power is not in the hands of the individual, but it’s in the hands of the sponsor, the person the company, the entity sponsoring the deal or The arrangement or the relationship, rather than the individual who’s putting their money into the deal. So you know, my opinion, follow commandment number three, thou shalt maintain control. And so that’s what this interview is about today, you know, I’m not getting any money from him, I don’t accept money from guests, you know, people have offered me money to come on the show. No, we don’t take money to put people on the show.

In fact, some other podcasters are out there charging guests to be on their show. I don’t want to say I’ll never do anything like that. But it just I’ve never done it so far. And it just does not strike me as having journalistic integrity. So now a word from our sponsors, just kidding. So anyway, I do sound kind of excited, just because I’m really just into the whole idea of this individual empowerment. And of course, we are working on a tool to help you with this even more, to help you with self management to help you have more control over your investment properties, a software tool, and it’s looking pretty good, I have to say, Our team is doing a great job on it. And we will be talking about that this weekend in Rhode Island. At our venture Alliance event, we’re going to be presenting a little bit about this tool and what it can offer to investors. And maybe some of our venture Alliance members and our venture Alliance mastermind will become beta testers, maybe some of you will as well look for a future message on that. And you can learn more about it on a future episode. But before we get to our guest today, I just want to talk about a you know, the subject of inflation. And there’s a great article in Zero Hedge, which, which really does have some some good stuff. I don’t like Zero Hedge in some ways, because, you know, it’s kind of this like, underground sort of gold bug mentality. And, you know, I don’t agree with that. I think gold is a lame investment, I don’t think it is an investment, I don’t think silver gold or any of these things are investments, I think they are simply a way to save money to store value and insurance policy. So again, to qualify as an investment, I as I always say, it has to produce income, if it doesn’t produce income, if it doesn’t have rent, if it doesn’t have cash flow, it does not qualify as an investment.

Now, don’t be too confused about that, because income is judged by the noi, the net operating income, it is not judged by the cash flow, okay, so I don’t want to misspeak there. Because if you have an investment property that is very, very highly leveraged, maybe it’s actually over leveraged, it could have breakeven or even negative cash flow. And it could still actually be a good investment that is actually possible. And I have talked about that on some of the past 571 episodes of the show. And so just keep that in mind, I don’t want to go down that rabbit hole today. But go to Jason hartman.com. In the search bar, you can type deferred down payment, you can learn a little bit more about that. It’s it’s about the net operating income, not the actual final cash flow, because that many times is influenced too much by leverage, we should view leverage as a separate component of it. Okay, so this Zero Hedge article, It’s entitled, and it’s by Tyler Durden, obviously a fake name right from the movie Fight Club, which was a excellent, very well written movie, by the way, the mystery of the missing, inflation solved, and why the US housing crisis is about to get much worse. Now, when you say housing crisis that has many, many meanings, because what they’re talking about here, in in a large portion of this article, is they’re talking about the end. It’s in bold, it says The reason for this is very simple, I’m quoting is a very simple if dramatic, one, bold, the US transformation from a homeownership to society to one of renters. Okay. Now, is this a crisis? I don’t think so. I think it’s a huge opportunity. I love this. And this article really deserves probably some more attention on a future episode when we have more time. But let me just give you a couple of highlights. One year says at at this point, we should perhaps remind readers that according to the latest census data, the US homeownership rate tumbled to 63% Point 4% the lowest reading since the first quarter of wait for it. You’re ready 1967 Whoa, wasn’t that before Woodstock? You know the famous concert Woodstock? Right? Wow, that was a long time ago. Isn’t that when Nixon was known Nixon was elected in 70 in 1970, right? Because he would have gone till? No, you would have been 72. I’m getting my dates a little mixed up here. Was that in the that was the LBJ era, right? Wow, that’s a long time ago. In fact, it says it’s the lowest homeownership rate in 48 years. I am very excited about that. In fact, I’m so excited. Let me just play the sound effect, what’s going to be the sound effect?

And look, you know what I’ve said about this, I’m probably the only guy in real estate that thinks the homeownership rate should actually decline. I think it should be about 55%. Because I don’t think there’s anything wrong with renting. I think this whole idea of everybody should own a home is sort of a silly idea. It’s not necessarily good for them. I’ve talked about the well known Time magazine article from a few years ago, that talks about how unemployment rates in areas with high homeownership are higher because people can’t move to the jobs. The best thing you can have on a resume is mobility. You’ve heard me say that many times. And so you know, this is all part of this. So again, a huge opportunity for investors. The demographics coming at the rental market for the next decade are nothing short of phenomenal. Quite possibly, as I’ve said the best they’ve ever been in history. You look at the rent inflation Okay, so median asking rent for vacant rent units and rent inflation. Let me see here it says since there is an unprecedented demand for rental units across the US as quote owning unquote, alternative has become inaccessible. The median asking rent not only soared at an annual rate of over 6%. Okay, I’ll I’ll cease with a dumb sound effects. Well, maybe not. You know, that’s the first time I’ve ever done sound effects. So give me a give me a long leash on that. Okay, because, you know, we never did those cheesy sound effects before. But I just happen to have my little sound effects machine that I use at seminars sometimes, right here on my desk. So 6% it has never been higher with the census department recently reporting that the median us asking rent, just hit an all time high of $803. Okay, and the article and then there’s a graph and the article goes on to say what is odd is that According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the BLS rent inflation is far less at just 3%. In the most recent print. One wonders what seasonal adjustments American renters should use to make their monthly paychecks smaller the way the BLS perceives it. Okay. You know, of course, this is all the manipulation they’re talking about. Still at 3.6%. It is the highest annual rent inflation since 2008.

Folks, the opportunity is excellent for investors, investors that are buying in cashflow oriented linear markets, where properties make sense the day you buy them, where you’re following my 10 commandments of successful investing, income property, of course, the most historically proven asset class in the entire world. One more point, and herein lies the rub the article goes on. And this is in bold, because it is not so much what the real honest inflation growth rate of rent is. It is what the off setting income growth is. Unfortunately, while the BLS can seasonally adjust rent payments to make them as low as a bunch of bureaucrats want. The bigger problem is that us household income is not only not keeping up with rent inflation, it is far below it. In fact, as reported last week, real income is now back to this is really, really depressing. You’re ready for this is now back to 1989 levels. That is terrible news. Again, I don’t think we need to be this homeownership society. But I certainly think we need to see incomes going up in real dollar terms, not a nominal dollar terms. And Americans have not had arrays for decades. That is not good. But as I’ve talked about, and I’ll tell you this next, creating wealth in today’s economy live seminar that I do, and the next Jason Hartman University class that we do, and the upcoming meet the masters program that we do, that many of you have already signed up for, go to Jason hartman.com, for that, and make sure you get your early bird price tickets for meet the Masters coming up. But the next one we do, you know, we’re gonna dive into this a lot more because many people have asked me, especially years ago during the financial crisis, when my message, and you can hear this on the flashback Friday episodes. And, of course, if you attended one of our live events back then, when my message was much more gloomy, okay, as it was with everything in the in the media and the economy. It was it was definitely more gloomy. And people used to always say, Jason, if, you know, if incomes are going down, if inflation is high, if unemployment in the future is going to be bad, then we’re depending we’re depending on people to rent our properties. They’re not going to be able to pay the rent, I would always answer that question by drawing two ladders on the flip chart. And those are the the economic ladders. And it shows one ladder shows people moving up, not so much of that, you know, according to these gloomy articles, and people moving down more of that. And it talks about how economics is a relative phenomenon. It’s a relative phenomenon, think Einstein’s theory of relativity. And as such, that means that it’s not, it’s not that they won’t be able to rent some house, it’s what house See, the house is not a fixed thing. So you know, in the future, if technology doesn’t rescue us, which by the way, it might, and all of these problems may just disappear, because technology is so incredible, and it’s such an amazing time to be alive.

I’m ultimately an optimist. But we’ll see, you know, can the can the crap the bureaucrats and the government has done to our economy? Can it be outdone by the power of free market, technological innovation? It’s possible? We don’t i don’t know which one will be the stronger of the two forces. as the years go by? I mean, it’s an amazing time to be alive. There’s no question about it. But there are serious issues with debt with income levels in terms of in real terms being at 1989 levels, and rent inflation being higher. So if you talk to your tenant 510 years from now, they might say to you, well, I used to own a house, and the house that I owned, was in a nicer neighborhood. And it was 2000 square feet. And now I’m living in a lesser neighborhood. And the house I’m renting from you, Mr. And Mrs. Landlord, is only 1500 square feet. So it’s not a matter of Will they be able to afford a house it’s it’s a matter of the house asset is obviously not fixed. So that that changes with with the investor or with the renter, of course, and their their standard of living is what is under attack. That’s what can decline in this type of situation.

So anyway, I’m going to long here as usual, I’d love to stick around and talk to you just forever. Apparently you guys like my diatribes. So I appreciate you listening. Thank you. Thank you for putting up with me. Go to Jason hartman.com. Get your ticket for meet the Masters coming up in January in Southern California. You venture Alliance people we look forward to seeing you in Boston, Martha’s Vineyard, Providence, Rhode Island, Newport, Rhode Island. We got an awesome weekend planned. And next week, we’ll report back to everybody about it. If you’re interested in the venture Alliance, and we’ve had more and more people expressing interest, go to venture Alliance mastermind.com. That’s venture Alliance mastermind.com and Jason hartman.com. Those are your two resources. Let’s dive in. And let’s hear about empowerment. When it comes to rehabs repairs, and maintenance of your properties. This is one of the many things, amazon.com also has a program like this. There’s some good stuff here. So let’s talk to the CEO and founder of pro.com.

It’s my pleasure to welcome Matt Williams. He is the founder and CEO of Pro.com. And he is the former CEO of a company you all know, and that is digg D I G G, former CEO of Digg, entrepreneur in residence at Andreessen Horowitz. And it’s great to have him with us today. Matt, welcome. How are you?

Matt Williams 20:32
Good. Thank you for having me.

Jason Hartman 20:33
Good. It’s good to have you. Give our listeners a sense of geography. Where are you located?

Matt Williams 20:37
Up in Seattle? Washington.

Jason Hartman 20:38
Okay, good stuff. Beautiful place when it’s not raining.

Matt Williams 20:41
That’s very true.

Jason Hartman 20:42
Bet you’ve heard that before.

Matt Williams 20:42
Which is most of the year.

Jason Hartman 20:44
Yeah. Well, that’s why it’s beautiful.

Matt Williams 20:46
That’s good.

Jason Hartman 20:47
Yeah, good. So you know, before we dive into pro.com, I’m sure listeners would love to hear a little bit about Digg and, and your experience there as CEO. Can you just give us a little background on that,

Matt Williams 20:58
Ah, sure. I’ll just actually walk through a little bit of my background. I started out as a kind of a son of a mother and father who were entrepreneurs in completely different industries, and ended up starting my first company when I was 23 years old. I sold it to Amazon. And I was at Amazon for about 12 years in various roles, one of which included shadowing Jeff, and, and leading our our third party, kind of e commerce site business called webstore. And spent quite a bit of time in in that business, learning the the ins and outs of building marketplaces, early days of Amazon’s community, and I had a passion very few people knew about for news, and decided to leave after about 11, almost 12 years at Amazon, to be the CEO of Digg at a time where Digg was, had just launched its its v4 and was in a tear in the wrong direction, and was able to get that get that turned around and then sold just under two years later.

Jason Hartman 22:01
So what is v4?

Matt Williams 22:02
Yeah, so for those, those that remember

Jason Hartman 22:04
That was a controversial thing, right?

Matt Williams 22:06
It was a very controversial launch that, that the founder of Digg and the team had launched, which, which was an attempted a deeply personalized news experience. Unfortunately, it really tore apart the primary, you know, dynamics of the community itself. How it worked, how stories were promoted, you know, the, the whole mechanism for digging itself was, was changed. And, and it was it wasn’t, it wasn’t purposeful, that, that the the website would change that dramatically, but it did. And the community was very upset about it. And ultimately, I, you know, came in to try to kind of try to really bring back the community and, and the website, and was able to get the the metrics turned around. But it was very, you know, different, I think, experience for many of the many of the users after that dig before launch.

Jason Hartman 23:00
Yeah, so the complaint with v4 was that it was an invasion of privacy or something, right?

Matt Williams 23:04
No, it was really that, that the the gamification of Digg, as it was, had changed dramatically. So there, you know, Digg had been built on a community of users that were very passionate, very active, about finding the most interesting news of the day,

Jason Hartman 23:20
and basically voting them up or down the chain. Right?

Matt Williams 23:23
Yep. Yeah, voting them up.

Jason Hartman 23:25
You know, I wish we could do that with traditional media that we see on television.

Matt Williams 23:31
One day, yes. And so that’s, that’s how it works. And with the, you know, with the the change in the, the algorithm, as well as the, you know, the website, front end, it really made a big difference in how stories were voted. And it really attempted to clean up the voting process, but through that, it did not yield really a anything like the previous Digg experience in terms of the best of the day, getting promoted to the top. So, so we quickly came in and listened to the community, you know, made a number of changes to the website experience to, you know, to really try to, you know, bring back the, the the community’s impact on the news, and what was the best news of the day, and really just had a number of, you know, community members that, that, you know, that were in, up in arms about it and did not like, you know, the the new site that had launched So, it was a

Jason Hartman 24:30
I remember when that happened, I didn’t follow the story much. But I just remember seeing some of these really, you know, negative, very irate posts online, on various social media and so forth about Digg and so forth. You know, these people were, like, the biggest fans in the world, I guess. And they felt alienated after this, right?

Matt Williams 24:50
Yes. And we had to go out and I spent a lot of time actually talking to some of the power users and some of the Digg community to understand what, you know, what contributions they were making and how they would make them going forward. And even reinstating some of their profile metrics, which would, you know, which were a loss but had not been, you know, replaced when the the new site launched. So, there’s just a whole whole series of things that really, you know, brought the community up in arms,

Jason Hartman 25:16
But you turned it around and then sold the company after that.

Matt Williams 25:20
Yeah, it was, it was sold out for a couple years. And then I was entrepreneur in residence at Andreessen Horowitz, and incubated pro.com out of my time there at Andreessen

Jason Hartman 25:29
And who was the Digg buyer? just out of curiosity.

Matt Williams 25:31
The Digg buyer was actually it, it came out in a couple of different ways. We had kind of company Washington Post that was, you know, very much into what we’re doing as a team. And so they actually, you know, brought most of the team and some of the technology

Jason Hartman 25:48
Oh, and Jeff Bezos’ on the post. And yeah,

Matt Williams 25:51
Yeah, that actually was right before that, that we sold the company.

Jason Hartman 25:54
That’s your old boss. Yeah.

Matt Williams 25:56
Yes. And, and then the, some of the, the IP and the, the other assets went to a few other, you know, kind of companies, and one of which was specifically beta works on the East Coast that actually took over the website and, and has changed it into what it is today.

Jason Hartman 26:11
And will go on to pro.com here. But what years, were you working with Jeff at Amazon? I mean, that was the early days, right?

Matt Williams 26:19
It was, yes. My company livebid.com was acquired in 1999. And I was there through 2010.

Jason Hartman 26:26
Fantastic. I, my dream is to get Jeff on the show someday. So, we’re working on that one. But good, so your new venture pro.com, I really wanted to have you on the show, because of course, we’ve got such a big audience of real estate investors. And Matt, they’re all, you know, we find people are really willing. And, you know, I’ve been in that business for a good 11 years now, of people who are willing to invest nationally, you know, they want to, they want to, or people in foreign countries that are clients of my company that invest in the US and, you know, they have properties, they’ve never seen tenants they’ve never met and, and, you know, you can make that work nowadays pretty darn nicely. And you can be in the market that really offers the best ROI. But on the downside of that, you know, you can’t drive by your house very easily. You can’t go swing your own hammer with, God, why would you want to anyway, in fact, this kind of gives you a discipline of not having to ever do that. But pro.com solves some of these problems. I think it could be a good tool for investors,

Matt Williams 27:28
We do and in fact, a lot of our customers, you know, that we have in different parts of the country have, you know, have some kind of a rental house or have a rental property that they’re managing, or that might be helping a family member or, you know, they’re one of their parents get their house fixed up. And or even to fix something that breaks and, you know, pro.com makes it you know, super easy to find out how much it’s going to cost to get some work done in and around the home in any zip code across the country. And then get that work scheduled and get that work done in usually a matter of days. And it’s it’s a very fast process for entering you know, your your work that you’re going to get done, find out what the what the cost is in your locale, and then to schedule it with a trusted kind of vetted, pre qualified pro in your in your area. And so pro.com has been doing that for the past year and a half. Under, you know, the the pro.com name. What we’ve been doing in real estate is even you know, is even more interesting, because we’ve started to actually take some of that technology and the pricing and applying it for homeowners to actually take a look at. What does it cost to maintain this home? What if I were to get my home ready for sale? What would I want to do to my home, and usually most agents recommend two or three or four or five different things to get the home ready for sale. Well, all of those we’ve predefined with agents, and so to go get your home ready for sale, an agent or their homeowner client can go and check check, check and see Oh, this is going to cost you know, 800 to $900 to get this room painted, to get this changed out to get you know, a new stainless steel appliance installed. And that is been a huge headache for most, most realtors and most, you know agents and so we both are helping homeowners get anything done in and around the home. And you know, in the real estate community itself, helping agents to get homes ready for sale and you know, help price out home improvement projects once homes are purchased.

Jason Hartman 29:24
Now, Matt, I mean, come on. Seriously, you can’t be coming on the show saying it’s difficult to deal with contractors. Right.

Matt Williams 29:32
That’s the easy part.

Jason Hartman 29:35
I tell you, maybe the two most picked on occupational groups are lawyers and contractors. That’s quite possible.

Matt Williams 29:45
And for good reason though.

Jason Hartman 29:47
I agree. For good reason. Yeah. So there’s there’s definitely some truth in it. But I mean, look at there’s a lot of people in this space. A lot of players. There’s, you know, I don’t even know if they’re still around but I remember that company dial one. There’s Angie’s List. That’s different than what you do, I know. But but you know, just help us distinguish that marketplace a little bit and in what is the real unique selling proposition of pro.com?

Matt Williams 30:11
Sure, it’s really that we’ve built the most comprehensive pricing engine, for any home project, bar none, if you’re, if you want to find out what it’s going to cost to get something done for your home, you just visit pro.com, type it in, and you’ll have an answer in a matter of seconds. I think that most other services that are out there are simply trying to just connect you with a pro. And the moment they’ve done that, they’re out of the picture, they you know, they they wipe their hands of anything you’re going to going to do moving forward, and they usually get paid some kind of a lead generation fee, you know, for that, you know, by the Pro. Our service is very different, we only make money, if we connect you to a great Pro, who does a good job. And you know, and you pay at the end of the day, it’s a, it’s a commission, it’s a marketplace model very similar to, to a, you know, product marketplace you might see where a commission is paid on the product that gets purchased, you know. Our model is to make the consumer, you know, have a, you know, a successful kind of transaction with a pro or the pros on time they do good work, the customer is happy. And then the pro gets paid, we then earn a commission on that. So it’s a very different model. So pros like it a lot, because they don’t pay anything to get a lead. They’re ultimately either getting a job, and then they pay for that job if it comes through, and they complete it, or they don’t. And so it’s a very different model for the Pro. And then for the consumer, we have the most comprehensive pricing engine, that you can price any home project and get a pro who’s pre qualified and trusted in a matter of minutes.

Jason Hartman 31:41
Okay, but when you say pricing engine, of course, if you call, let’s use a painter, for example, you call one painter, and he’ll give you one price. And another guy comes out for to give you a quote, and it’s a different price. And then the third one is a third price. And you know, they all kind of say they’ve got better quality, they’re more attention to detail, whatever their shtick is, right? Are you saying that these things are really all these home improvement projects are really commodities in the sense that there shouldn’t be a difference in price, like, you know, in the old days are still the current day really but the old model is you call you get those three estimates on painting, and they’re all different. And you know, we all kind of scratch our heads and run and wonder why well, maybe this guy, you know, is just more greedy, you know, that charges the most? Or maybe he runs a less efficient business? Or maybe he’s a real artisan and craftsman. I mean, how can you say the price is all the same, right? Aren’t contractors, different?

Matt Williams 32:43
Contractors are very different. And I think that’s that’s part of the problem in the industry is that there, there’s a real lack of transparency of what it actually costs to get a service done in or around the home. And painting your room is a great example. So if you go to visit pro.com, and type in painter room or paint my kid’s bedroom or paint my room, you’ll find out that in Seattle, it’s roughly $361 to $385. Now, the beauty of that is that’s what it should cost to paint a room. Now, if you want more than two coats of paint, you’re going to have multiple colors involved, you have high ceilings, you can actually adjust that estimate yourself and find out that that’s actually closer to $409 to $433. Now, you want to get your baseboards painted, you can say Oh, let me add base, you know, paint my baseboards. And that, you know, that ultimately adds another $139 to $275. So painting a room with baseboards is now $548 on average.

Jason Hartman 33:42
What about the type of paint?

Matt Williams 33:44
Well, so that’s the that’s the this is the this is the the labor cost and most, most customers, they’re they’re choosing the ceiling fan for install, they’re choosing what paint they want to use, right. So that that is a cost that they already know, usually from visiting a paint store or picking out the paint themselves. Though the certainly the pro can also price that out and add that to you know, the estimate. But what we do is instantly provide you what it should cost to get that work done to get the labor done, you know, for that job and put you in the in the control of Oh, let me actually customize this, let me actually customize the dimensions of my room or you know whether or not we have vaulted ceilings. And it’s that it’s that question of what should it cost? It’s kind of like true car does for the automotive industry, what it should cost is incredibly empowering to the consumer because then they can ask the pro Well, you know, what pro.com told me it should roughly be, you know, this price, why isn’t it that price and then the pro knows, they can have you know, a very open discussion with the customer. Oh, it’s because you know, your rooms actually a little bit larger or you also have two different windows and you need to paint the trim around those windows. You know, it’s we break it down in terms of the actual you know, costs of You know, the sub cost of the of the work that’s being done. But it’s so simple for the consumer. You literally type in painter room, you can you know, move a, a bar to the left or right in terms of complexity, and you know, modify one other dimension, like the dimension of the room, and you can instantly see a price. A price estimate.

Jason Hartman 35:19
Okay, that’s, that’s interesting. So you have a sophisticated engine, then is what you’re saying, Matt? What about bigger jobs? I mean, you know, if summer is coming, and you decide, hey, you know, I want to add a sunroom or a swimming pool. I mean, you know, that stuff is just cloaked in mystery. I’ve done many landscaping projects, and they’re all over the board.

Matt Williams 35:42
Yeah, it’s very true. But there are some very common ones, like build a deck. and building a deck has a number of different components, the, you know, the square footage, the whether or not it’s on a raised, you know, on a on an incline, whether or not it requires stairs. railings, right. I mean, it’s there, you know, there are a handful of questions that if you answer, you can come up with what it should cost to build a deck in Boston versus Seattle. And so we have done that we’ve built that engine for every single job you can imagine in and around the home. And if you want to remodel your kitchen, or your bathroom, and you want to replace the vanity, change the tub, you know, do two or three things versus five things, you can go choose what you want to do, and then see what that will cost

Jason Hartman 36:26
I was going to pick on Seattle, as you were mentioning the painting of the house example in in your town, of course, your engine has to adjust for $15 an hour minimum wage, right?

Uknown 36:37
We, the the labor rates are actually set per locale. And it’s really contractor Labor Rate. So it’s not, it’s it’s, it’s, you know, far different from, I guess, the minimum wage discussions, because most of the contractors have different rates, if you’re a plumber, or an electrician, you know, in part based upon the the state requirements of what you have to do to get licensed and everything else.

Jason Hartman 37:00
Oh, sure, sure. But but it’s not, it’s not on common that a painter would have some helpers, that are minimum wage, or maybe just above minimum wage type.

Matt Williams 37:09
Absolutely, still, at the end of the day, most, most jobs are priced out, you know, on some hourly basis that that is the the standard hourly rate for painters. And, and so that’s how they calculate most of their estimates. And regardless of the underlying labor, and how they, you know how that that labor is used, you know, their jobs have, you know, have to, you know, factor in the total cost of the job.

Jason Hartman 37:33
So let’s kind of recap the uniqueness of pro.com. So it’s basically the sophisticated pricing engine. So the consumer is empowered with the BS detector, right? They don’t, they don’t have to accept this stuff from contractors. And then the other part of it is that contractors don’t pay for leads, but they do pay referral fees on completed paid jobs, right?

Matt Williams 37:59
That’s correct.

Jason Hartman 38:00
And I assume you do all the payment processing, right?

Matt Williams 38:02
We do for most of the jobs, and it’s fairly standard in the industry, if you’ve got a general contractor you’re working with, and they bring in another contractor or Pro, they’re paying them some, you know, usually modest, you know, modest fee based upon the total value of the job. So we’re, we’re very much in line with the industry practice in terms how general contractors work with subs.

Jason Hartman 38:22
Okay, so I just, you know, don’t take offense to this question, but I just want to ask you, like, how significant is that? The pricing engine component? I it sounds like, that’s really your big deal. And I’m sure you’ve spent probably a fortune in, in time and resources, figuring this out. I mean, that’s got to be pretty complicated stuff. You know, for example, maybe before you answer, I remember I was at one of these walk in clinics recently had to have a little quick medical thing. They told me that there are 1000s of what do they call them treatment codes, or something, you know, for every little thing you could possibly imagine that a doctor could do, right? How many things are there? For example, in the home improvement world?

Matt Williams 39:06
That’s a great question. There are 1000s of I guess you would call them common projects. And the 1000s of common projects are paint my room, replace my toilet, fix my sink. Right, there are, you know, there’s a fairly actually common set of even hundreds that happen to most homes, but there are 1000s that are that are, you know, kind of start to get into the tail. And then within those, you probably have multiple variations of those, right? So if it’s paint my room, does it include the baseboards, the crown molding, the trim of the windows? There are a number of different variations on those. So the permutations, you know, probably get into the, you know, 10s of 1000s of different job types that are most common when you start combining those things. We’ve built an engine to take all of that complexity out of, you know, out of the hands of the consumer. Just make it really simple to understand. I’m a homeowner, I have this job I’m trying to get done. This is how much it should cost.

Jason Hartman 40:06
Yeah. Okay. Okay. So that is the big thing. That empowerment of knowing that right?

Matt Williams 40:11
It is. And we did a lot of research upfront, we actually started the business under a different name and somewhat in, you know, kind of under the radar, purposely to just start helping customers get pros and get work done at their homes. And all of the research that we did, and all of the feedback that we got from customers was really helped me understand how much is this going to cost before I, you know, get this project scheduled. And it’s it, as it turns out, is a huge pent up demand of customers that just don’t want to start their projects, because they don’t know how much it’s going to cost. They don’t want to pick up the phone and call a pro. And so what they’ll do is they’ll just go to our website, or call or text us and find out how much it should cost.

Jason Hartman 40:54
They can text you?

Matt Williams 40:56
Yep, they can call they can text, they can use the website and find out how much it should cost.

Jason Hartman 41:00
And I assume that all of your various vendors, there’s a rating system. So you know, people can see how good they are, you know, kind of like pay Amazon, you know, ratings and reviews are

Matt Williams 41:11
There is. Absolutely, yeah, absolutely. And it’s every single Pro, we will survey the customer after the job. And so the homeowner gives us feedback, you know, after the job, and then we we publish that it’s only for homeowners that got work done by the Pro, so you can’t just go and submit a review on our website. It’s verified, verified purchasers. And which makes all the difference in the world compared to most other sites that just let anybody post. And it’s, you know, it really truly represents the value that that pro brought to that customer because you’ll you’ll see different ratings for you know, value versus quality workmanship, that kind of thing,

Jason Hartman 41:51
Right. Good stuff. Yeah. Yeah, that’s interesting, man. Are there any things you’d like the listeners to know, maybe a question I didn’t ask you that you want to just say something about?

Matt Williams 42:00
Well, we were getting asked a lot about how real estate agents interact with, you know, with our new offering, which we call premiere Home Services. And, and I may have alluded to it briefly, you know, earlier, but we work with real estate agents all around the country, to send out, you know, really local relevant content to their past clients. And we give the agents a whole dashboard with what their past clients might be interested in. Some things you know, would include, you know, home remodels, whether that you know, that past client might be looking to buy or sell a home. And so for the, you know, within the real estate industry, we’ve actually done a lot of work as a part of the National Association of Realtors, we’re part of their accelerator program. And so we’ve built a whole product in the industry just for real estate agents that, you know, that we have. And for the homeowner, it’s great because we’ve you know, we’ve created a whole maintenance calculator for what it costs to maintain your home, if you want to get your home ready for sale, you can see the top 10 things you should do, and you can check check check, and then it’ll show you how much that would that would cost. And so we’ve we’ve done a lot to, you know, to to bring, bring the data and the pricing engine part of our business actually deeper into the real estate industry.

Jason Hartman 43:18
Okay, good, good stuff. And the website, obviously, pro.com. Listeners, I do want to tell you, if I sound sort of enthusiastic or really interested in this, it is purely innocent, because I’m not getting paid by pro.com. We’re not an affiliate, you’re not an advertiser or anything like that. I’m just, I just think this is an empowering type of service, whether it be this one you use, or some of the other sort of related services out there for investors. And that’s why I wanted to have him on the show. Plus, I love the Digg story as well, and the Amazon story. So that was great. But who knows what the future will hold, maybe we’ll do some business together at some point. But But again, this is an empowering tool. And I just want to clarify one more thing for investors, because we have so many investors that are, you know, they look at it from a nationwide perspective, okay. And they may be in foreign countries, but they own US properties, or they may be in California and own property in Tennessee, or Texas or Georgia or whatever. I mean, they can use this nationwide, right? They just plug in the zip code of that property probably and, and get. See. That’s the thing I don’t like about Angie’s List, it’s all localized, you know, you have to join over and over again for every city in which you own a property. And that’s, you know, that sort of cumbersome for this type of thing.

Matt Williams 44:32
Yes, yes, no, it’s a it’s a completely free service to the homeowner, and right now to the real estate agent as well. And it’s, it’s very simple to use in any zip code. And so if you’re a customer, you just come to pro.com and you can type in your project. If you’re a real estate agent, you can go to pro.com slash real estate and see you know, the offering that we have there for you, but it’s it’s a purposely free service to to really make it easy for the homeowner to get work done.

Jason Hartman 44:58
Good stuff. Matt Williams. Thanks. for joining us,

Matt Williams 45:00
Thank you.

Announcer 45:02
I’ve never really thought of Jason as subversive. But I just found out that’s what Wall Street considers him to be.

Announcer 45:09
Really. Now how is that possible at all?

Announcer 45:12
Simple. Wall Street believes that real estate investors are dangerous to their schemes? Because the dirty truth about income property is that it actually works in real life.

Announcer 45:23
I know I mean, how many people do you know not including insiders who created wealth with stocks, bonds and mutual funds? those options are for people who only want to pretend they’re getting ahead.

Announcer 45:34
Stocks and other non direct traded assets are a losing game for most people. The typical scenario is you make a little you lose a little and spin your wheels for decades.

Announcer 45:45
That’s because the corporate crooks running the stock and bond investing game will always see to it that they win. This means unless you’re one of them, you will not win.

Announcer 45:55
And unluckily for wall street. Jason has a unique ability to make the everyday person understand investing the way it should be. He shows them a world where anything less than a 26% annual return is disappointing.

Announcer 46:10
Yep. And that’s why Jason offers a one book set on creating wealth that comes with 20 digital download audios. He shows us how we can be excited about these scary times and exploit the incredible opportunities this present economy has afforded us.

Announcer 46:25
We can pick local markets, untouched by the economic downturn, exploit packaged commodities investing and achieve exceptional returns safely and securely.

Announcer 46:35
I like how he teaches you how to protect the equity in your home before it disappears and how to outsource your debt obligations to the government.

Announcer 46:43
And this set of advanced strategies for wealth creation is being offered for only $197.

Announcer 46:50
To get your creating wealth encyclopedia book one complete with over 20 hours of audio go to Jason hartman.com forward slash store.

Announcer 47:00
If you want to be able to sit back and collect checks every month, just like a banker. Jason’s creating wealth encyclopedia series is for you.

This show is produced by the Hartman media company All rights reserved for distribution or publication rights and media interviews, please visit www dot Hartman media.com or email media at Hartman media.com. Nothing on this show should be considered specific personal or professional advice. Please consult an appropriate tax legal real estate or business professional for individualized advice. opinions of guests are their own. And the host is acting on behalf of Empowered Investor network, Inc. exclusively.